
"Girl Tech's mission is to encourage girls in
technology use by creating products and services just for
them." (Girl
Tech Mission Statement) Girl Tech, founded by Janese
Swanson, sets out to meet lofty goals. But who better to
lead the battle then Swanson who holds several degrees in
Education, a doctorate in Organization and Leadership and
completed her dissertation on gender issues and play
preferences in technology and toys. She provides a vast
amount of interesting research and insights into the
world of gender and computing, specifically young girls
and the electronic toys that are right for them. Yet it
seems as if she failed miserably in her attempt to apply
this research to the products her company releases.
Taking a look at her research, it is clear that
Swanson has a strong grasp of the existing gender
differences in the computing world. Few can argue that
most of the toy world targets young boys. Walk into any
toy store and you see rows and rows of action figures,
toy weapons, electronic video games and other games all
geared toward boys. In a November 1995, press release,
Girl Tech claims that, "...girls need and desire toys and
games that reinforce their sense of independence,
inventiveness, natural inquisitiveness and belief in
unlimited possibilities." The press release continues by
claiming, "While traditional girls' products are enjoyed
by many, it is time to cater to the diversity within the
gender and offer girls contemporary alternatives. It's
time to offer product choices that support girls'
adventurous spirit while building necessary skills around
technology." The press release explains this is the
reason Girl Tech exists.
Keeping this in mind, let's take a look at a couple of
Girl Tech products. Their products sold on the web
include a Snoop Stopper Keepsake Box which locks away
secret items from snooping friends, a Me-Mail Message
Center which allows the owner to leave protected messages
to herself, a Zap 'N Lock Journal which (you guessed it)
keeps secret writings away from prying neighbors, and a
Swap It Locket which allows one of the owners to send a
secret message which can only be heard by another owner
of a Swap It Locket. For a company that strives to "cater
to the diversity within the gender and offer girls
contemporary alternatives" it doesn't seem to be fairing
too well.




Although Swanson's research and Girl Tech's press
releases encourage the production of toys which do not
perpetuate gender stereotypes, many of Girl Tech's
products do just this. Every one of the products
mentioned above is based upon the assumptions that girls
snoop, keep secrets and have stuff to hide. Are these
messages we want to be sending our girls? Giving Girl
Tech the benefit of the doubt, it is likely that many
girls will enjoy these products. But there will be many
others that will not. What are we saying to the girls who
do not enjoy these products? Do we want to be giving them
the message that there is no place for them in society?
Our society is so obsessed with splitting people into a
dichotomy, that these girls who do not like "girlie
games" are not going to know how to react.
The Girl Tech web site contains a number of services
and features targeted specifically for girls. Many of
them successfully do just this. Some of the positive
sections include a search engine which searches for girl
friendly sites; a game cafe which has both on-line and
off-line games; an inventor's page which contains stories
about women inventors, has tips for thinking of your own
inventions and a place to show off your own inventions; a
Girl's View section which has information about girls in
the news, book reviews, software reviews among other
content; a sports section, which features women athletes;
and a girl's world site which takes a look at women in
history and women in the work force.
But each of these sites, in one way or another,
continues to perpetuate gender stereotypes. The sports
section, for example, still lacks women representation in
many male dominated sports. Likewise, the look at women
in the work force contains multiple examples of women in
all kinds of careers but the one that is showcased is
that of an actress. The most blatant example of gender
stereotyping on the Girl Tech site is Chick Chat. The
name in and of itself is controversial and many see it as
derogatory. Girl Tech addresses this issue by allowing
users to write in and comment on what they think of the
name. The company claims that they are attempting to
change the meaning of the word from derogatory to
harmless. But regardless of how the term is used many
would argue that we should not encourage our girls to
think of themselves or be called by a term that also
refers to the offspring of a farm animal. Very few men
would agree to be referred to as pups or calves. So why
do our women and girls put up with it?
Many of the stereotypes which are perpetuated
throughout the Girl Tech web site are ingrained in us at
an early age. The fault for these blatant wrong doings
cannot just fall onto the shoulders of Girl Tech.
Unfortunately, these stereotypes are not just limited to
computers and technology. Girl Tech sets out to achieve
some noble goals. Yet in doing so, the company stops one
step short of encouraging gender equity. As an end
result, it ends up doing exactly what it set out not to
do.
Relevant Girl Tech Links:
How
do they rate those girl sites? Other FAQ.
Links
to Teachers Resources
Differences
Between Genders
What
teachers, parents, peers, etc. can do to reverse
stereotypes.