Dennis D. Gooler in "The Education Utility: The Power
to Revitalize Education and Society" raises four gender
questions in regard to introducing computers into the
classroom. He claims these questions must be seriously
addressed before putting technology into the classroom.
The following is a one by one breakdown of his four main
points.
1. What is the extent of the gender discrepancy?
Many people's intuitions about the way girls and boys
interact with computers are fairly close to accurate.
Several studies show a differential in both the use of
and attitude towards computers between boys and girls.
Boys continue to be fascinated by computers and dive
right into the computer world without much encouragement.
Girls, on the other hand, begin hesitant, fearful of the
machines and often need guided encouragement in order to
be successfully introduced to computers. In a study done
which looked at how many computer science courses 200
gifted students enrolled in, 90% of the boys chose to
take a computer course while only 10% of the girls did
so. Since this particular study examined the class
choices of gifted students it is fair to assume that lack
of ability was most likely not a determining factor when
deciding which class to enroll in. It all boils down to
the fact that society encourages boys to be more
interested in computers resulting in more self confidence
then girls about their ability to work with
computers.
2. Why is the gender discrepancy important?
Despite the reasoning behind these gender differences
in approaching computing, girls may be placed at a
significant disadvantage in a society in which we value
computer technology as if our existence depended upon it.
Gooler claims, "It seems clear that females may be
eliminating themselves at a very early age from career
choices by these negative attitudes. Because computers
are being used so pervasively across all of business,
industry, and the service sectors of our economy, females
may be penalized in their career options because of these
predispositions." Additionally these types of attitudes
could have a severe impact on the self-esteem of girls on
a whole. When half of the human race feels inferior about
a technology that is inundating our every day lives
problems are going to occur.
3. What causes the gender discrepancy?
When taking a close look at society's perspective on
the new technology, it is no surprise women and girls
feel the way they do about the technology. "Evidence of
the association of computers with males is found in a
number of areas, including advertising for computers,
computers software and role models such as teachers,"
explains Gooler. Girls are being told by all aspects of
the media that computers were designed for, marketed for
and exist solely for boys. Existing software confirms
this attitude. It is tailored towards what boys like and
often are made only with boys in mind. The Director of
Educational marketing for Apple Computer, Gregory Smith,
was quoted as saying, "The buyers of Apple computers are
98 percent male. We do not feel that women represent any
great untapped audience." As the Director of Educational
marketing, Smith has indirectly asserted that males are
not only more important than women in the computer world
but that this hierarchy also rolls over to the education
world. Few educators are willing to be as open about
their thoughts on gender differences in education but it
is often by school actions that many feel the same way as
Smith. This is evident in the fact that often times
computer classes are in the math department, have math
prerequisites or are seen as math classes themselves.
Women, who are already disadvantaged in math classes,
often predict that computer science classes are the same
way and as a result shy away from them. Very little is
done in these situations to encourage girls to give
computer science a try. Instead the boys fill up the
classes, and the gender stereotypes are perpetuated.
4. What can be done to counteract the gender
discrepancy?
Gooler claims there are twelve circumstances which
impede computer access and use. He claims they are as
follows:
- Lack of encouragement for females to use
computers
- Potential value of computer learning more apparent
to males than to females.
- Bias against females and minority students in
software and advertising.
- Prerequisites irrelevant for computer access and
instruction
- Limited computer access for females during free
time
- Under-representation of females in computer
leadership roles
- Dominance by one student over another during
computer time
- Pressure from peers not to participate in computer
activities
- Under-representation of females and minority
students in computer clubs
- Inappropriate location of computers within
schools
- Inability of teachers and students to recognize
and deal with problems in computer learning
- Shortage of qualified personnel for computer
teaching
Ideally, if we could overcome or reverse the results
of these obstacles we might even out the playing field.
But many of these circumstances are the result of notions
which are ingrained into us at an early age.