"The facts about the increasing use of
information technologies in public schools are stunning.
In the last decade alone, the number of students per
computer went from 125 to less than 10. In some
technology rich schools, there is one computer for every
three students." (Teaching With Technology, xi)
Computers are quickly inundating our schools. Everyone
from the White House to state governors to individual
parents are encouraging schools to bring computers into
the classroom. But few are stopping to take a look at the
impact computers will have on the classroom.
Apple, however, is doing just that. Through its
on-going project Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow (ACOT),
Apple is investigating the role computers will play in
K-12 education. The program chose five schools across the
United States spanning grades K-12 and donated enough
computers for at least one class to provide each student
with a computer in the classroom and at home. The
teachers participating in the program also received
computers for classroom and home use. The program's only
stipulation was to let Apple observe the effect the
technology had on the classroom. There were no teaching
or curriculum requirements. Teachers chose how and when
they wanted to incorporate the computers into their daily
schedules. A number of interesting results have been
pouring out of this study since it began.
In the beginning stages of the program, teachers were
frustrated and described their experiences as similar to
their first year of teaching. Experienced teachers felt
like they had to start from square one. Very few were
quick to change their teaching styles in order to
accommodate the new technology. They had many fears in
regard to time constraints, student interaction and
student interest.
But as time went on teachers began to question their
long standing beliefs about teaching and their role in
the classroom slowly began to change. As teachers
realized that student interest in the technology was high
and that it encouraged more student interaction then
simply lecturing and traditional drill and practice
routines, teachers began to work computers more and more
into the daily routine. The role of the teacher began to
change from that of a lecturer to that of a mentor or
guide. Classrooms became more student-centric and less
teacher-centric. Teachers began teaming up and
collaborating on new ways to incorporate technology into
the existing curriculum and often designed new
curriculums with the technology in mind.
But ACOT did not just produce positive results. The
study raises a number of ethical questions that must be
addressed. Many disparities were revealed between
children of differing socioeconomic and ethnic
backgrounds. Students who had parents who were
knowledgable about computers were leaps and bounds ahead
of those who didn't. ACOT gave students computers to use
in the home, but in any other scenario, many children
would only have access to computers while they were in
school. These students were severely disadvantaged
compared to those who had access to technology at
home.
Other discrepancies arose in student interactions in
the classroom. Some students were more controlling and
dominating then others. Shy students, minorities and
those who didn't have computer experience were often
pushed aside by others who were more confident about
their computer skills. Inequities prevailed throughout
the program.
Although computers can have a significant posititve
impact on a classroom setting, it is important to not
overlook the drawbacks. A number of ethical issues remain
to be addressed both within ACOT and other applications
of technology in the classroom.