|
Volume 1 |
|
|
|
Part One: The Bright, White Boys' Lunch Club
Janet Ward Schofield recounts her experiences observing Whitmore High School in her book, "Computers and Classroom Culture." She conducted a two year study on the impact of computers on the classroom. In Chapter 5, she recounts the details of the school's computer room which was open during lunch allowing the students to use the computers during their free time. She explains that in a short matter of time the room played host to "a bright, white boys lunch club." As one observer's field notes read: "Today, as is frequent, the second lunch period attendees are all white males." Schofield explains there were many aspects of the computer room that attracted boys and kept girls at a safe distance. Schofield explains, "The computer room not only provided an environment that supported fantasy behavior reinforcing certain aspects of traditional masculinity for the students who attended; it also fostered competitive behaviors, another very obvious aspect of male social behavior at Whitmore." Many of the boys who took part in the computer room activities needed to have a place to reinforce their masculinity. Very few of the room's visitors played sports or expressed their masculinity in more traditional ways. The computer room allowed them to find and assert their own little niche. But these same factors which attracted the boys are what kept the girls away. The competitive nature of the room created an intimidating atmosphere which only compounded the girls' fears in regard to the computers themselves. Many of the girls, unlike the boys, had little difficulty hanging out and talking with friends and had no need for the computer room. The boys, on the other hand, needed the computer room setting to facilitate interaction. The students were very aware of the absence of girls. When asked about this, students were quick to respond: Interviewer: It seems like most of the students in the [computer room] during lunch are boys. Why do you think that is? Richard: They're more computer oriented, possibly. Most girls don't like computers. Arlene: Well...the girls in my class...don't really like computers...Most girls don't. Its usually boys who are into it... My brother got me hooked on computers. At first I was the only girl in there [the computer room], but then Toni started coming up because she needed help from Ms. Prentiss and then she got her friend Margaret to come up too. At first the girls are really hesitant. They don't really want to come up. Mr. East, one of the teachers who helped supervise the lunch room and also taught adult computer classes, said that typically in the Community College computer classes his students are fathers and sons. When asked if there were any girls who participated he said, "Well, there are one or two girls, but they're the powerful type." He explained this to mean, "Well, you know, boy-type girls." He likened computer hacking to a sport like hunting or fishing and that men and boys use it the same way. That is, it gives them something to discuss, something to compare their skills at. Mr. East was not alone in his thinking. Many of the boys used the computers as a way to compete with each other. Much of the lunch room talk was centered around who had the highest score in which game. To most girls, this was not an appealing aspect of computers, putting more distance between them and the opportunities in the computer room. The girls thought of the computers in a much different light. They used them to complete specific tasks. They more were concerned with the computer's utility then with exploring or playing games. Boys also recognized the benefits of computers as powerful tools, especially in terms of finding jobs and future careers. But most of their positive reaction came from the competition and challenges that the computer presented. Boys were content with exploring the machine. They enjoyed anything that could help them feel as if they had mastered something. The computer provided just that. The computer allowed boys to test themselves, both against the machine and against others. This difference in attitude was not just present in the students. It carried over to the teachers as well. Interviewer: Did you find it difficult at all to learn to use the Apple once it came [into your classroom]? Mr. Powers: No, not too difficult, I caught on to mine pretty easy and it's sort of addictive, you know, once you get into it. It's a powerful machine." But not a single female teacher interviewed reacted to computers in this way. Female teachers were more concerned with their application to their own classroom and many were surprised at their male counterparts fascination with the machines. Ms Wright [speaking about why she had decided to use computers in her French class]: You could use it for a lot of things. You could use it for quizzing them [students]. The computer would keep score for you...But just to use the computer for the sake of using the computer is not my idea of fun. In her conclusion at the end of this chapter, Schofield points out that she does not want to make either claim 1) that boys and girls are biologically different and thus have different opinions about computers and their usage and 2) that our society in one such that girls are raised in fear of computers and other technology. Instead, she claims something in the middle of these two extremes. She suggests that, "social arrangements and educational practices that isolate girls who want to use computers, that emphasize the link in our society between computing and masculinity, and that do not effectively compensate for the likely initial disparity in prior experience between male and female students tend to reinforce preexisting differences in interest and expertise by discouraging many girls from seeking out opportunities to use computers."
|
![]()
Date Last Modified: 3/15/98
© 1998 Huang, Ring, Toich, Torres. All rights
reserved.